Kids Say Physical Discipline Doesn't Work


Thu 29 Sep 2005

A study released by Save the Children this week looks at children’s perspectives on family discipline, and sends a strong message to parents ...

A study released by Save the Children this week looks at children’s perspectives on family discipline, and sends a strong message to parents that physical punishment does not work.
The research, conducted by child advocate Terry Dobbs and commissioned by Save The Children New Zealand, shows an alarming rate of physical punishment used in ordinary Kiwi families.

More than nine out of 10 (92%) of the 80 children aged between five and 14 years interviewed for the study said they had been or that they believed children were smacked. Some reported being hit around the face and/or head, and with implements. Many described it as the first line of discipline the parent used, rather than a last resort.

The children reported parents were often angry or stressed when they smacked, and would later express regret or offer ‘treats’ to compensate. Children said smacking made them feel angry, upset and fearful, and was not an effective form of discipline.

“The information contained in this study is crucial for decision makers and every parent and caregiver of children in New Zealand,” Save The Children New Zealand executive director John Bowis says.

“Children’s voices are often missing from the debate around family discipline and effective parenting. The level of physical punishment reported in the study is shocking and delivers crucial information for the debate around the repeal of Section 59 of the Crimes Act 1961. Children need to be listened to in discussions about issues that affect them. They have some important messages which challenge the assumptions of many parents out there”.

The study also found children were more often hit by fathers and male members of the household and were more often physically punished for hurting others.

“This sends a contradictory message to children,” Terry Dobbs says. “Children are told that it is wrong to hurt someone else and yet they are hurt in response to hurting others, this is a confusing message for children”.

Children suggested that parents should stop being angry, and talk to children explaining what the child had done wrong before administrating any family discipline, as this would have better outcomes for both children and parents. They said that talking with children about the rules the child had broken would assist the child’s understanding, rather than using physical punishment, which did not. They said using ‘time-out’, having privileges removed or being grounded were more effective means of discipline.

The research formed the basis of Ms Dobbs’s thesis for her Master of Arts in Childhood and Youth Studies completed earlier this year and was supervised by University of Otago’s Children’s Issues Centre.

The children were chosen from 10 different schools – ranging from decile one to 10 across five geographical locations in New Zealand. To fit the criteria for the study, the children had to have no known or alleged history of abuse or neglect and sufficient verbal skills to participate in focus group discussions. They were questioned using a storybook methodology about their experiences and understanding of family discipline and their views of the effects of various disciplinary techniques.

The report can be obtained from Save the Children, phone (04) 385 6847 or www.savethechildren.org.nz