Understanding research on risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence

cover-image Issues Paper 10, June 2016

Understanding research on risk and protective for intimate partner violence

Authors: Pauline Gulliver1, PhD and Janet Fanslow2, PhD

1 Research Fellow, School of Population Health, University of Auckland

2 Associate Professor, Social and Community Health, School of Population Health, University of Auckland; Co-Director, New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse

Downloads

Understanding research on risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence (PDF, 1.9 MB)

Understanding research on risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence (Word DOC, 3.3 MB)

Key messages

  • Conceptual models guide the exploration of risk and protective factors.
    • Conceptual models help us to organise our thoughts and identify relationships between the different risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence, and other forms of violence.
    • Some conceptual models (such as the ecological model) have helped to expand our understanding of the wider societal and community factors that impact on violence experience.
    • Consistent findings at the international level have allowed the identification of a common set of factors that are strongly associated with violence experience, but these are not the only factors that influence the likelihood of violence occurring.
  • There are some challenges involved with measuring some risk or protective factors
    • Most of the research identifying risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence collect information at only one point in time. The result is that it is difficult to establish whether factors that are related to violence experience caused the violence or are a result of experiencing the violence (or both).
    • While, the use of controlling behaviours is strongly associated with violence experience, behaviours can mean different things to different people. It is important to understand the context of an abuser’s behaviour in order to fully understanding the meaning.
  • There is no “one true cause” of intimate partner violence.
    • Violence is typically the outcome of the interaction of many different factors.
    • Individual, relationship, community, social and cultural factors work together to enhance or reduce the likelihood of violence being perpetrated or experienced.
    • Violence is a behaviour which is governed by choice. Decisions and subsequent actions are influenced by societal attitudes about what is considered acceptable behaviour.
  • A comprehensive, multi-pronged approach is required to address intimate partner violence as well as other forms of family violence in New Zealand.
    • Lessons can be learned from systematic approaches to addressing other problem behaviour patterns. For example, addressing the road toll required:
      • Investment in infrastructure
      • Legislation to reduce risk
      • Social marketing campaigns
      • Improvements in safety design
      • Swift and sure punishment where laws were broken
      • Increased resourcing at high risk periods
      • Consistent and adequate funding over a sustained period of time
  • To optimise the likelihood of success a long-term investment in policy, infrastructure and communities is required. This needs to be supported by an overall strategic government framework for addressing IPV.

Recommended citation

Gulliver, P., & Fanslow, J. (2016). Understanding research on risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of Auckland.

ISSN: 2253-3222, published online only.

Feedback

The Clearinghouse welcomes your feedback. Please email us - we would love to hear your comments on this issues paper.

Other Issues Papers

Read other Issues Papers